Talk:Main Page

I'd like to open a personal account http://indexholding.ae/buy-zyloprim-without-prescription/ buy allopurinol The crux of the argument for the players is essentially this: The league took no “remedial action” to protect its players from unnecessary harm until 1997, when it started its concussion program “ostensibly to research and study brain injuries affecting NHL players.” During the study period from 1997 to 2004, the suit states, the NHL “voluntarily inserted itself into the scientific research and discussion” about the link between player injuries and short- and long-term brain damage. By doing so, the lawsuit argues, the league took on the responsibility to do four things: tell the truth; introduce rules or programs to deal with the problem; not to continue “complacently with the same conduct that nurtured violent head trauma while advancing the NHL’s financial and political interests”; and to tell other players about the risks.