Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From vjmedia
(I'm a member of a gym http://www.causaabierta.com.uy/catalog/turfa/ turfa Twins aren't always twice as nice; they have much higher risks of prematurity and serious health problems. Nearly half of all)
(Thanks for calling http://www.causaabierta.com.uy/catalog/triptanol/ buy triptanol online Soviet leader Josef Stalin arguably set the bar on 20th-century totalitarianism. But it took him years to ga)
Line 1: Line 1:
A financial advisor http://www.causaabierta.com.uy/catalog/umbral/ buy umbral  That's a hard one to answer in just a few words. But I guess the easiest way is that there has been a very successful campaign that began as soon as the government began passing civil rights laws to say that now that the country cannot legally discriminate, race is not longer an issue we need to — or can — address. This is the whole notion that racial segregation by law is wrong but that the fact of racial segregation is not. And this notion began really as soon as the federal government began enforcing Brown v Board of Education. The very same people who promoted and enforced racial segregation by law, once the laws changed, they said it was wrong to use race to undo that segregation. And our nation has largely bought into that.
+
A financial advisor http://www.causaabierta.com.uy/catalog/umbral/ buy umbral  That's a hard one to answer in just a few words. But I guess the easiest way is that there has been a very successful campaign that began as soon as the government began passing civil rights laws to say that now that the country cannot legally discriminate, race is not longer an issue we need to — or can — address. This is the whole notion that racial segregation by law is wrong but that the fact of racial segregation is not. And this notion began really as soon as the federal government began enforcing Brown v Board of Education. The very same people who promoted and enforced racial segregation by law, once the laws changed, they said it was wrong to use race to undo that segregation. And our nation has largely bought into that.

Revision as of 14:27, 2 October 2014

A financial advisor http://www.causaabierta.com.uy/catalog/umbral/ buy umbral That's a hard one to answer in just a few words. But I guess the easiest way is that there has been a very successful campaign that began as soon as the government began passing civil rights laws to say that now that the country cannot legally discriminate, race is not longer an issue we need to — or can — address. This is the whole notion that racial segregation by law is wrong but that the fact of racial segregation is not. And this notion began really as soon as the federal government began enforcing Brown v Board of Education. The very same people who promoted and enforced racial segregation by law, once the laws changed, they said it was wrong to use race to undo that segregation. And our nation has largely bought into that.