Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From vjmedia
(Thanks for calling http://whistlinjacklodge.com/archer-slot-free-play/ slot archer At the other end of the spectrum are countries such asIndonesia and India, which didn't binge on credit, but instead)
(Have you got any ? http://www.365casinos.com/happy-bugs-slots/ happy bugs slot And, as well as carrying out health and safety risk assessments for school trips and other activities they should also a)
Line 1: Line 1:
I came here to study http://www.365casinos.com/hellraiser-slotplaza/ hellraiser casino  A referral of the Syria situation would also answer a critique of the Security Council that has tarnished the ICC’s credibility — that the council acts selectively when referring situations to the court. To date, the council has referred only two, both in Africa. The charge of selectivity is often framed as a rhetorical question — Why Libya but not Syria? — that a Syria referral would finally answer.
+
I came here to study http://www.365casinos.com/hellraiser-slotplaza/ hellraiser casino  A referral of the Syria situation would also answer a critique of the Security Council that has tarnished the ICC’s credibility — that the council acts selectively when referring situations to the court. To date, the council has referred only two, both in Africa. The charge of selectivity is often framed as a rhetorical question — Why Libya but not Syria? — that a Syria referral would finally answer.

Revision as of 13:03, 30 August 2014

I came here to study http://www.365casinos.com/hellraiser-slotplaza/ hellraiser casino A referral of the Syria situation would also answer a critique of the Security Council that has tarnished the ICC’s credibility — that the council acts selectively when referring situations to the court. To date, the council has referred only two, both in Africa. The charge of selectivity is often framed as a rhetorical question — Why Libya but not Syria? — that a Syria referral would finally answer.