Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(A company car <a href=" http://www.kimsookarate.com/buy-fosamax-online/ ">fosamax 35 mg</a> Murdo Fraser, a Tory MSP and prominent wind farm critic, said: “We’re building more and more wi) |
(I'm not sure <a href=" http://www.lancashiretourismawards.co.uk/the-event/ ">erythromycin price malaysia si</a> Where then should the debate go? Despite the tension between the critical perspectives) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I'm not sure <a href=" http://www.lancashiretourismawards.co.uk/the-event/ ">erythromycin price malaysia si</a> Where then should the debate go? Despite the tension between the critical perspectives on corporate tax reform, the current debate has landed us in so perverse a place that win-win reform is easy to achieve. The center of the issue is the taxation of global companies. Under current law U.S. companies are taxed on their foreign profits (with a credit for taxes paid to other governments) only when they repatriate these profits to the United States. Right now U.S. companies are holding nearly $2 trillion in cash abroad. Â The companies argue, with some validity, that current rules burden them by making it expensive to bring money home without raising much revenue for the government because it has no claim against foreign profits that are not repatriated. They hope for and call for relief arguing that it will help them bring money home at a minimum for the benefit of their shareholders and possibly to increase investment. | |
| − | |||
Revision as of 11:55, 6 September 2014
I'm not sure <a href=" http://www.lancashiretourismawards.co.uk/the-event/ ">erythromycin price malaysia si</a> Where then should the debate go? Despite the tension between the critical perspectives on corporate tax reform, the current debate has landed us in so perverse a place that win-win reform is easy to achieve. The center of the issue is the taxation of global companies. Under current law U.S. companies are taxed on their foreign profits (with a credit for taxes paid to other governments) only when they repatriate these profits to the United States. Right now U.S. companies are holding nearly $2 trillion in cash abroad. Â The companies argue, with some validity, that current rules burden them by making it expensive to bring money home without raising much revenue for the government because it has no claim against foreign profits that are not repatriated. They hope for and call for relief arguing that it will help them bring money home at a minimum for the benefit of their shareholders and possibly to increase investment.