Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(Where do you live? <a href=" http://urbanrez.ca/help-in-assignment-writing/ ">research papers in english</a> NFL teams don't like players making injury information public. Regarding the sensitive nat) |
(When do you want me to start? <a href=" http://www.wattsequipment.com/about-us/ ">topamax 200 mg a day</a> For those who don't recall the specifics, Facebook originally filed to sell 337 million shar) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | When do you want me to start? <a href=" http://www.wattsequipment.com/about-us/ ">topamax 200 mg a day</a> For those who don't recall the specifics, Facebook originally filed to sell 337 million shares at between $28 and $35 per share (a particularly wide range). It later increased the range to $34-$38 per share, and ultimately priced 421 million shares at the high end, raising approximately $16 billion. All well and good until it was time for the shares to actually begin trading. The first glitch was immediately apparent: NASDAQ couldn't handle the volume, delaying orders for more than an hour. Part of this was due to massive buy-side demand. Some of it was because of an unexpected rash of sell orders, prompted by a downward revision in revenue projections (which Facebook had soft-sold in its S-1 document, but made more explicit to certain bank analysts). | |
Revision as of 12:49, 12 August 2014
When do you want me to start? <a href=" http://www.wattsequipment.com/about-us/ ">topamax 200 mg a day</a> For those who don't recall the specifics, Facebook originally filed to sell 337 million shares at between $28 and $35 per share (a particularly wide range). It later increased the range to $34-$38 per share, and ultimately priced 421 million shares at the high end, raising approximately $16 billion. All well and good until it was time for the shares to actually begin trading. The first glitch was immediately apparent: NASDAQ couldn't handle the volume, delaying orders for more than an hour. Part of this was due to massive buy-side demand. Some of it was because of an unexpected rash of sell orders, prompted by a downward revision in revenue projections (which Facebook had soft-sold in its S-1 document, but made more explicit to certain bank analysts).