|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Have you got a current driving licence? http://myder.org/puba/ puba
om So when Obama said on 10 September that his administration knew Assadâs chemical weapons personnel had prepared the attack in advance, he was basing the statement not on an intercept caught as it happened, but on communications analysed days after 21 August. The former senior intelligence official explained that the hunt for relevant chatter went back to the exercise detected the previous December, in which, as Obama later said to the public, the Syrian army mobilised chemical weapons personnel and distributed gas masks to its troops. The White Houseâs government assessment and Obamaâs speech were not descriptions of the specific events leading up to the 21 August attack, but an account of the sequence the Syrian military would have followed for any chemical attack. âThey put together a back story,â the former official said, âand there are lots of different pieces and parts. The template they used was the template that goes back to December.â It is possible, of course, that Obama was unaware that this account was obtained from an analysis of Syrian army protocol for conducting a gas attack, rather than from direct evidence. Either way he had come to a hasty judgment.
| + | |